Which replication method is MOST appropriate for data integration from multiple remote offices?

The most appropriate replication method for data integration from multiple remote offices is site-to-site replication. This method allows for the establishment of a replication process that connects different physical locations, enabling data to be synchronized across these sites.

When dealing with multiple remote offices, it’s essential to ensure that data integrity and consistency are maintained across all locations. Site-to-site replication is designed to facilitate this by transferring data between two or more sites, thereby allowing for updates in real time or near-real time. This setup is particularly beneficial for organizations that require data sharing and collaboration between various offices, ensuring that all sites have access to the most current data and applications.

In contrast, other methods may not provide the same level of integration and can be limited in functionality. Server-to-client replication typically focuses on disseminating data from a central server to individual clients, which may not gather data from multiple remote offices effectively. Server-to-server replication is generally used for failover and load balancing between servers rather than direct data integration from multiple sites. Disk-to-disk replication often pertains to backup and redundancy at the storage level rather than addressing the needs of multiple remote offices for data integration.

Thus, site-to-site replication stands out as the suitable choice for scenarios where multiple locations need to share and